Tag Archives: Conversion

Parallel Lines

I have only just seen the film ‘Yesterday’, a remarkable take on waking up in a world where nobody, except you, has heard of The Beatles. Do you make you living out of singing their songs as if they are you own?

Now I feel that I am in a parallel universe where the rapist is the victim and the raped are the perpetrators. It seems as if all women have vaginas so they can be blamed for being raped. Even female babies. no? All paedophiles are victims of their families so whatever they do has to be allowed. They are the victim, not the children. We must forgive them, but not ask the children if they forgive them. This is the world I seem to have woken up to at present.

South Africa, which is owned by China, the Tik Tok alogorithms that run your lives and information, and that of journalists too lazy or stupid to do research, took Israel to court for Israel having been attacked, mutilated, raped, burnt alive and babies microwaved, all on film by the perpatrators. And still these events are denied even though the perpatrators filmed them. This is the dystopic world that George Orwell warned us about and is happening.

I am told that context counts. Having a vagina is a context. Does that mean you deserve to be raped if you have one?

Nothing, no context, no history, no feelings of grief, annoyance, anger, abandonment, fear or rage justifies the actions of October 7th 2023.

NO-THING.

But what I am feeling about this parellel universe is that South Africa, not exactly the paradigm of human rights, is taking Israel to court for genocide.

The Jewish people have experienced attempts at Genocide for thousands of years. The Christians (and therefore Europe) cannot stop their attempts at Genocide against Jews. In the 21st century Antisemitism is rife. I never trust an antisemite. If they are an antisemite they are lying about not being racist, mysoginistic, and a whole host of other prejudices.

But not only Europe, the bastion of Christianity nowadays. The USA, a Christian country in all but name, suffers from this anitsemitic trope- the Jews killed Jewsus so they deserve to die. This has been the trope for 2000 years. Apparently, Collective Responsibility is not allowed, unless directed at Jews, so every Jew alive today is responsible for the death of Jesus, even though the Romans did it actually, but no German is responsible for WW2 or any Muslim for ISIS etc.

The false tropes (the blood libel where Jews are said to make Matzos – flour and water bread biscuits similar to those used now in Christian comminion services- out of Christian childrens blood). I wonder what Moses and the Israelites made Matzos out for 1000 years before Christian (or Muslim) children existed? So much stupid that I must be in a parallel universe. The Jews are the people that brought a stop to human sacrifice and the eating of blood, any blood from any animal. The Christians are the ones that not only eat Black Pudding (congealed blood) but commemorate the sacrifice (kill) of their human/God each week, eat his flesh and drink his blood. Gosh.

So what is this truly about?

The Christians and Muslims are still fighting the Crusades since about 1100 CE. It is boring, but there it is. Christianity and Islam are both Proselytising religions. I think this point is important. We are not sat here worrying about the Hindus, Jains, Buddhists or Jews coming to force us to convert. We are sat here worrying about the Christians and Muslims converting people. Proselytising is a form of Imperialism which has colonial consequences. If you look at a map of the world (or at my post Maps) you will see that most of the world has been colonised by Christianity or Islam. Not by Jews!

Christianity spread by the Roman invasion and colonialisation of Israel. Like many colonialists, the Roman Empire (colonialists) changed the name of countries they invaded, in this case they changed the name of the country of Israel to Palestine. The British did the same with their empires: for example Mynemar/Burma; SriLanka/Ceylon.

Israel is Palestine and Palestine is Israel. Israel is the non-colonial name for the colonial Palestine. Palestine itself was never an independent state, never had a flag of its own, a currency, a language or a leader. Israel was a country of its own as in the Bible and the New Testament and in the Quran. The Romans killed Jewsus and blamed the Jews. They knew a lot about the Hebrew religion and incorporated it into their propaganda. They were the Russians of their day.

By this logic, and I am sorry, but logic seems to have been lost on a generation that does coding, all Palestinians have to be Jewish to be Palestinians and all Jews are also Palestinian.

The people who are now playing all of us are the Russians. They are still fighting the Cold War since 1917 (not just since 1945). Look at the USA. Trump (Trumpsky) visited Moscow and became President of the USA rather than Clinton.

Now everybody is saying it is Iran that is responible for all that is happening in the Middle East. The Arabs are stupidly allowing this too, but it is not the whole truth. Russia is playing Iran. When Russia gets what it wants it will discard Iran in the same way it did in Syria and the way it treated the Chechniyas (a Muslim country) who it is now using against Ukraine. Wake Up!

Why is Russia doing it? It wants to destabilise the West (Europe and America) and the Middle East so that it grabs power. It is using China to help. Africa, had been colonised by Christians and Muslims is now being colonised by Russia and China. So are the Caribbean Islands. So is South America, the Middle East and the Far East Russia is very rich in resources and poor on human numbers (China is the reverse). All these ‘independent’ countries think they are so clever, until payback time. Wakey wakey.

It never ceases to amaze me in this parallel universe, that people of African descent become Muslim or Christian, the religions of their oppressors. And that is another reason Jews are hated. They didn’t convert to Christianity or Islam. Like their God, the God of Abraham. they not only have faith, but also loyalty. It is a relationship and their God is not a fickle God, one minute choosing the Jews to spread the message, then dropping them and choosing the Christians or the Muslims. The God of Abraham does not do divorce. Despair perhaps, but not divorce. So the God of Abraham, the Jewish God, is still the God of the Jews. God didn’t swap sides like some childish football supporter or adulterer.

The woke left thinks itself incredibly clever too. G!d save me from Clever CLogs. They can argue themselves into a knot. Once you lose a moral compass and invent your own, you are prone to Fascism and that is where the woke left is going.

The payback will be intense. North Korea is not the place I would wish on you all, but it is the place you are all building.

Gaza could have been the Singapore of the Middle East. It was an independent state, hugely funded by the West with villas and hotels (all those visitors) and the ability to go on holiday too, just like others. Many people lived on welfare. That they allowed their sons, husbands and brothers to behvave as they do tells me a lot about the women as those men would not sleep easy in my house.

So while you are anti-Israel and anti-Jews (please don’t tell me they are separate, I am not stupid) you are being played. You are believing the perpetrators.

Israel is the open prison surrounded by stupid easily led regimes. Israel is the victim of abuse and hatred. Israel is the victim of attempted genocide in every generation. And you are buying into the Russian propaganda machine. Wake up the Woke ups.

Trans – Converting – Changing versus Appropriation

I am a Londoner. I am not boasting; merely stating a fact.

I was born and raised in London. That makes me a Londoner. I have lived in other places. But being born and raised in London means that I am a Londoner.

If I go to live in Paris or Venice for instance, I will not be Parisian or Venetian and I would bet that you would not think I was and the people who are Parisian or Venetian would not think I was. I would be a British person (specifically a Londoner) living in another place. We cannot change where we were born. We can change nationality, become, for example,  French or Italian, but we always remain an incomer of the place we live in. I say this in a town where 80% of the inhabitants are incomers, from all over the UK and abroad. I find it amusing and sometimes irritating when incomers call themselves Londoners. I am sure that I would not be counted as a Liverpudlian (from Liverpool) or a Brummie (from Birmingham) or a Mancunian (from Manchester) or an Amsterdam-er or whatever if I went to live in their town.

I point out Amsterdam as an example, having met a person from Holland who had lived in various places and then moved to London and thought that she too was now a Londoner, in the same way that I was. Her ally, from Toronto thought the same. I found this very strange knowing it would not work the other way round.

We are quite selective about what we think we can appropriate from others and whether they can appropriate stuff from us.

When is it sharing cultures, being multicultural (ie being nothing!) or is it an act of committing plagiarism and cultural appropriation?

I just saw an Instagram from a friend about  white men having their hair in plaits or cornrows.

We all know those white European men that grow dreadlocks and talk with a Caribbean accent (I love Caribbean accents) and play reggae music. Who thinks they are Caribbean? Who thinks they are black? Who thinks that they have had to put up with the experiences of being black in a white culture?

Empathy does not change your skin colour or your history, your memories or your childhood.

My friend did not like this latest hair fashion/appropriation. He complained that they were taking his traditional African heritage. I know there are also all those blond German women in plaits in photos from the 1930s, but I can appreciate his point.

He is not alone in thinking it:

http://thoughtcatalog.com/tessah-schoenrock/2011/04/an-open-letter-to-white-people-with-dreadlocks/

White women in saris; what do we think?

And that trend for putting a Bindi on your forehead with no understanding of what it is, reducing a cultural mark to a fashion statement. Is that a good thing, making it a universal mark, or appropriation of somebody else’s culture in a clumsy colonialism?

https://www.indiacurrents.com/articles/2015/09/07/why-white-girl-wearing-bindi

 

 

baptism

Recently, I have met quite a few people that have wanted to or have converted to Judaism. I am not always sure what they think they are converting to or why. I think they are converting to a religion. Their problem is that their parents and families are not also converting so they can’t have those same moments of going home to a traditional Shabbat dinner with parents etc.

You cannot change your history quite as easily as you may re-write it.

The Rabbis of old had a longer view. They willingly accepted genuine converts, but argued about whether they were the same as the children of converts or their children. It takes a few generations to become. There is a saying: ‘Question: Who is a Jew? Answer: A person who has Jewish grandchildren’. It might rule a lot of us out, and in an age of instant gratification, it might not be a popular view, but it may be true. Think about it.

If I emigrate to Jamaica and am granted Jamaican citizenship, how Jamaican am I?  I don’t share those memories. How Jamaican would my child be given that I might still do very British things at home? But my child’s child, my grandchild, brought up by a person born in Jamaica and probably another parent of Jamaican origin, would be Jamaican in a way I could never manage. I accept that.

Growing up is a big part of becoming who you are. When do we stop being who we were? What are we allowed to do when we change, to become who we are or who we want to be? And what is change and what is appropriation?

There are many people that I have encountered that have converted to Judaism and then started to  become an ‘Uber-Jew’, more Jewish than any other Jew. They start using Yiddish expressions, like the white man growing his dreadlocks and talking patois. Yiddish is not Judaism. That would invalidate all the Mizrahi and Sepahardic Jews who don’t know a bagel from a kreplach.

You can convert to Judaism (the religion) and be called a Jew or a Jewish person, but you cannot convert to be Ashkenazi or Sephardi, or Mizrachi. You still have the culture and ethnicity of your birth.

I know of one friend of mine who did this; became Uber Jew. Eventually, I complained. Even if they became ultra-orthodox or found out they had a Rabbi for a grandfather they would never be as Jewish in the way as a born Jew, nor be from a particular group such as Ashkenazi or Sephardic. They did not grow up Jewish in a non-Jewish world. They grew up in a religion that was quite dominant in their world. So they did not feel like an outsider. It was not the culture of their parents  They did not suffer anti-Semitism. Their parents did not have to protect them from this. They did not hold their parent’s hopes that they would ‘marry in’. They did not feel obliged to keep the faith or chose to lose the faith. They chose to become something as an adult. They moved from one place to another. This friend is fully entitled to do that and I treat them as a Jew, but they can also move back, of course, while a born Jew can never stop being Jewish, even if they do not believe in Judaism.

A convert to Judaism, can be more religious, but cannot be more Jewish than a born Jew, even one eating a prawn sandwich on Yom Kippur, who doesn’t do Judaism, the religion. No amount of throwing around Yiddish expressions in a pastiche of being Jewish will change that. You know what everyone is thinking when they find out your parents were Episcopalian or Catholic or whatever. I can’t help that, but I know that.

So how much can you change yourself?

I ask this with the trans- gender debate going on. I think if you want to change your gender and you are over 18, that is your choice. If you feel like that who am I, or anyone else, to argue otherwise? But, and there is a very large but, you need to accept that you will never be as like the other gender as the people born of that gender. Even the lapsed ones!

If you are born female you will always be more female than a trans female. Even if you dress in very butch clothes, have cropped hair and look like a man, you have all the body of a female. A trans woman has not gone through the same adolescence, sexual maturation and fertility maturation as a born woman. You just have to accept that. A trans woman will never know what a period pain is, the worries and anxieties about having a period (or not) or the pain (or joys) of childbirth. A trans woman will never have the fears of ovarian or cervical cancer nor the undignified medical checks. A trans woman has not had the same expectations from her parents as a born woman.

What you want and what is do not always concur.

So born women may feel differently about their bodies as they were born with them rather than chose them.  They may have hated being given dolls and dressed in pink, but even in black jeans and train sets they are female. Their childhoods, while individual, will have had things in common that are different to trans women and to try to diminish that is insulting to women, just as the dreadlocked white man will never really know what it is like to be of African or Caribbean origin.

Trans women often feel more comfortable with other trans women. Why is that? Are all born women uncomfortable with them or are born women not sure about this ‘Uber female’ one that out-females them and is often more ‘feminine’ than any born female, but has not had the bodily experience, the fears and anxieties of born women. To deny the born women’s experience is an insult to born women.

If you are a female transitioning to male you too will not become able to be a fertile male, You cannot pretend otherwise. You cannot have gone through some of the passages that most born males have gone through. You have not gone through the expectations of parents for that gender, right or wrong.

So while I completely accept that people may want to change their gender, they need to respect the people who were born that gender as being of that gender in a way that they can never be.

I am a Londoner. I cannot change that even if I live somewhere else. I can become for example French by changing my nationality, but not Parisian or Marseille, and I can never even be French in the same way that a person born in France and going through a French school and family is. My memories of childhood are different. I have to accept that too. There are times I would love to be something else and perhaps I can become that. But I cannot change my past nor invalidate the past of others who I wish to emulate. I cannot be more like them then them.